<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accenture unveils new public sector platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civsourceonline.com/2009/11/19/accenture-unveils-new-public-sector-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civsourceonline.com/2009/11/19/accenture-unveils-new-public-sector-platform/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=accenture-unveils-new-public-sector-platform</link>
	<description>The Source For Civic Leaders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:55:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tripp Babbitt</title>
		<link>http://civsourceonline.com/2009/11/19/accenture-unveils-new-public-sector-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-3332</link>
		<dc:creator>Tripp Babbitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civsourceonline.com/?p=2275#comment-3332</guid>
		<description>State governments need to be looking at the biggest lever for improvement . . . the design and management of work.  All this technology is only needed when we have such things as front office/back office, shared services and outsourcing.  This is to put old thinking with new technology and is done at great cost and worse service. A redesigned system would eliminate much of the front office and back offices in mosts cases and shared/outsourcing services should only be done after first optimizing the flow and pulling such ideas.  I rarely see this done in State governments or any other government entity.  So before we run off buying new platforms let&#039;s work on the design and management of the work.  There is a better way. 
 
Regards, Tripp Babbitt 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsystemsthinking.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.newsystemsthinking.com&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thesystemsthinkingreview.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.thesystemsthinkingreview.com&lt;/a&gt; (government help) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State governments need to be looking at the biggest lever for improvement . . . the design and management of work.  All this technology is only needed when we have such things as front office/back office, shared services and outsourcing.  This is to put old thinking with new technology and is done at great cost and worse service. A redesigned system would eliminate much of the front office and back offices in mosts cases and shared/outsourcing services should only be done after first optimizing the flow and pulling such ideas.  I rarely see this done in State governments or any other government entity.  So before we run off buying new platforms let&#039;s work on the design and management of the work.  There is a better way. </p>
<p>Regards, Tripp Babbitt<br />
<a href="http://www.newsystemsthinking.com"  target="_blank">http://www.newsystemsthinking.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.thesystemsthinkingreview.com"  target="_blank">http://www.thesystemsthinkingreview.com</a> (government help)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
